How Much Are You Willing to Pay for Your Internet Access?

In: Industry News

3 Jun 2009

I recently read an article about Time Warner’s intent to start metering broadband internet access, charging monthly anywhere from $15 (for 1 GB) to $150  for unlimited bandwidth. Now, to be honest, I really have no idea how much I download in a month but I would almost guess that I would probably fall somewhere in the $100 a month range should Time Warner succeed. That alone is enough to get me a little perturbed because I get the feeling that they’re just doing it in order to make up for the dwindling number of cable subscribers (thanks to the net).

But it also makes me feel like they’re really taking a step backward in terms of technological progress. Remember when standard cell phone plans maxed out at around 500 minutes a month and then would charge insanely large overage charges every minute you went over? That’s exactly what Time Warner’s plan reminds me of. Instead of moving forward in creating innovative services for customers to increase revenue, they’re taking internet access back about 10 years to the days where having high-speed internet was something only the “privileged” kids had. Back to when cell phones were still somewhat of a luxury amongst high-schoolers. Back when…well nevermind.

I can only imagine what this is going to mean for parents when their tech-savvy children are downloading their favorite desktop apps or episodes of their favorite TV program and start generating $500 monthly internet bills. Or for disgruntled customers who get automatically bumped up into the next usage tier for going over their limit by a couple bytes. Or even college students who live off campus that can’t download their class materials because their evil, inconsiderate roommates were up all night downloading “movies” so Time Warner slowed their connection speed.

Sounds like a REAL good plan Time Warner. What’s next? Charging for color television?

  • Share/Bookmark
  • Pretty ridiculous! I think they will shoot themselves in the foot with this type of backwards thinking. AT&T will definitely steal the show with their new UVerse fiber capabilities. Fiber to your block, copper to your house gives you get a 25 megabit connection to your home and at incredibly competitive price points. I'm still paying 35/mo to Time Waner and some how achieving 20Mbps download. I can only think it is because AT&T is turning up the competition.
  • I completely agree; this definitely has a "back to the old school" vibe about it, and not in a good way.

    I think the issue they are perhaps trying to address is precisely that of users downloading apps and programs, music and films; it is these 'illegal' downloads that not only quickly use up a GB allowance, but also clog the bandwidth for other users. That's probably their point of view.

    However, you nailed it in pointing out the backwards step; providers should be moving towards the direction of realizing public need and the characteristics of social internet useage, then adapting the system to improve useability, not adapting the price to beef up their own pockets.

    Just another twig on the tree of corruption.
  • Shust One
    I would be willing to pay $60 per month for internet access. I would have conditions though.

    The access would have to be unmetered and fast, at least 4Mbps. Right now I pay about $30 for 1.5Mbps but it is at least unmetered.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Categories

Twitter (@socialcollectiv)

Subscribe



Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner